Airport capacity need 'costing UK'

Heathrow chiefs want to see a third runway at the airport

Heathrow chiefs want to see a third runway at the airport

First published in National News © by

Lack of capacity at Heathrow is already costing the UK up to £14 billion a year in lost trade, according to a report.

This figure could rise to £26 billion a year by 2030, the report published by Heathrow added.

Heathrow bosses are keen to see a third, extra, runway at the west London airport but this has been ruled out for the time being by the Government.

The report said the UK needed one hub airport to compete with Europe. It added that having a dual-hub plan, where two sites would serve as hub airports, would not work.

The report also ruled out as "unviable" the so-called Heathwick plan, where Heathrow and Gatwick would be joined by a rail link.

Prepared by economics consultants Frontier Economics, the report said: "The choice for the UK is not between two hubs or one, but between one hub or none. Only a single airport can operate as a hub in the UK.

That leaves three options for the UK Government - It can do nothing and let the UK fall behind its European competitors at the cost of lost growth and jobs; It can add additional capacity at Heathrow; Or it can close Heathrow and replace it with a new hub airport."

The Government has appointed former Financial Services Authority chief Sir Howard Davies to head an aviation commission which will deliver its full report on UK airport capacity needs to ministers in summer 2015 - after the next general election.

A Department for Transport spokeswoman said: "The UK is currently one of the best connected countries in the world. Our airport network provides UK citizens and business with the international connections they need to trade, to visit friends and family and to go on holiday.

"Maintaining that is vital to our economy and history suggests that to do so, we will need an agreed evidence base and a high degree of political consensus. The strength with which the different options for achieving this are put forward shows precisely why we were right to set up a proper independent review with the timescale to consider fully what is in the country's interest."

Comments

Post a comment

Remember you are personally responsible for what you post on this site and must abide by our site terms. Do not post anything that is false, abusive or malicious. If you wish to complain, please use the ‘report this post’ link.

Send us your news, pictures and videos

Most read stories

Local Info

Enter your postcode, town or place name

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree