Man spared jail as ‘expert’ failed to correctly identify pistol

Police initially wrongly identified this firearm as a starter’s pistol

Police initially wrongly identified this firearm as a starter’s pistol

First published in News by

A MAN caught with a handgun has been spared prison due to the “tardy” and “highly unsatisfactory” actions of the police.

Thomas Parry was 17 when the weapon was found at his Bicester home in February 2010, but was not charged until July this year because a police expert initially identified the gun as a completely legal starter’s pistol.

Judge Charles Harris, who was shown pictures of the gun, described it as a “small automatic pistol” and said the weapon’s original analyst “could not have been much of an expert”.

Parry, now 20, admitted possessing a prohibited firearm and was sentenced at Oxford Crown Court on Monday.

The mandatory minimum sentence for such an offence is three years in jail for juveniles and five years for adults.

However, Judge Harris said the age of the offence and the actions of the police constituted “exceptional circumstances” and suspended Parry’s jail term.

Prosecutor Rachel Drake said: “On February 16, 2010, police had reason to attend the defendant’s home in Bicester as a result of a domestic incident being reported.

“This item was recovered from a bedside drawer.”

She added: “The item was wrongly identified as being a starter’s pistol. It languished awaiting destruction and it was only when officers came to formally destroy it they appreciated it actually fell within the firearms legislation.”

Related links

Judge Harris said: “I would have thought a fairly cursory look at a weapon like this would be able to tell whether or not it’s a starter’s pistol.”

Parry, now living in Gossway Fields, Kirtlington, told police he had been looking after the gun for a drug dealer who sold him cannabis.

The court heard that man has since been jailed and deported.

Trudi Yeatman, defending, said the her client, who has committed offences of battery and criminal damage since the gun was found, did not have any ammunition for it.

She added: “He was under considerable pressure to hide this weapon on behalf of someone who was supplying him with cannabis and to whom he owed money.”

Judge Harris gave Parry a year’s jail, suspended for 18 months, with 200 hours’ unpaid work.

He said the circumstances of the investigation were “highly unsatisfactory” and police were “exceptionally tardy in analysing the weapon they had”.

Police spokesman Chris Kearney: “We will take on board the comments of the judge and review the circumstances of the case. “While acknowledging there appears to have been a delay, the fact the weapon was seized and removed from the streets is a positive outcome.”

Comments (1)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

5:48pm Wed 12 Sep 12

ger elttil OX2 0EJ says...

Police spokesman Chris Kearney: “We will take on board the comments of the judge and review the circumstances of the case. “While acknowledging there appears to have been a delay, the fact the weapon was seized and removed from the streets is a positive outcome.”

Whilst doing jury service in 2001 I sat on two cases, one of theft, burglary, possession, the other of false imprisonment and sexual assault. In the first the guy was guilty, but the police did such a bad job of trying to frame him and lying on oath, that the defence ripped them (the police) apart and we had to find him not guilty. And on the second, it was a lovers tiff between two teenagers that the police should have had the sense not to anywhere near. Again not guilty. That was two weeks of public money and court time wasted. Now 11 years on we have the same old drivel about learning and reveiwing procedures. Sorry but the system (as shown by todays hillsborough findings) is rotten to the core and needs to be sorted. But who is honest enough to do so?
Police spokesman Chris Kearney: “We will take on board the comments of the judge and review the circumstances of the case. “While acknowledging there appears to have been a delay, the fact the weapon was seized and removed from the streets is a positive outcome.” Whilst doing jury service in 2001 I sat on two cases, one of theft, burglary, possession, the other of false imprisonment and sexual assault. In the first the guy was guilty, but the police did such a bad job of trying to frame him and lying on oath, that the defence ripped them (the police) apart and we had to find him not guilty. And on the second, it was a lovers tiff between two teenagers that the police should have had the sense not to anywhere near. Again not guilty. That was two weeks of public money and court time wasted. Now 11 years on we have the same old drivel about learning and reveiwing procedures. Sorry but the system (as shown by todays hillsborough findings) is rotten to the core and needs to be sorted. But who is honest enough to do so? ger elttil OX2 0EJ
  • Score: -69

Comments are closed on this article.

Send us your news, pictures and videos

Most read stories

Local Info

Enter your postcode, town or place name

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree