Hi-tech housing of the future is revealed

An artist's impression of the eco town An artist's impression of the eco town

Developers have revealed details of a £95m “groundbreaking” housing scheme which will pave the way for future homes in the UK.

A2 Dominion will build 393 homes packed with eco technology to kickstart a 5,000-home eco settlement at North West Bicester.

Built in traditional style, the homes will feature free daytime electricity from solar panels, cut price heating from underground pipes and bulk buying deals.

Diggers are expected to roll on to the site off Banbury Road this autumn and the first eco residents could be in by Christmas 2013.

Plans for the first phase – homes, a school, pub, business centre and shops – were approved last summer.

A2 Dominion project director Steve Hornblow described the development as “groundbreaking”. He said: “We are very much into making sure the scheme is sustainable in the long term not just the short term.

“Hopefully the extra work we are going to do is going to create that sense of community. It’s not just 400 boxes but a sustainable community.”

The firm has been involved in building eco homes in Oxford – at Salesian Gardens, Temple Cowley, and Sunnymeade Court, Cutteslowe – to eco level code four, but the Bicester scheme will take it to the next level.

Mr Hornblow said: “Code level five is a big difference as it’s zero carbon on the energy side. It’s the only scheme in the country building the true definition of zero carbon.

“It does cost more to build an eco house – whether we can achieve a high sales value is still to be decided. Nobody has done it.

“We don’t know at the moment but we expect them to be similar prices to any other development.”

The highest level is code six, but developers say the site will be unique when taken as a whole development.

One of the toughest challenges will be to hit the target to reduce car usage.

Developers hope the estate will have no more than 50 per cent of trips made by car, compared to a survey showing 67.5 per cent currently in Bicester.

Mr Hornblow said: “We are trying to be realistic and practical about these targets. It will change over time, but it’s a big ask.”

To hit the target, initiatives will be included such as electric car charging points, a car club, footpaths and cycleways and a bus service – organised by the developers – with stops a maximum of 400m from any home.

Every house will have solar panels, making the scheme the largest residential solar array in the country, rainwater harvesting and heat provided from underground pipes.

The so-called exemplar site will be built in four phases over five years.

Mr Hornblow also confirmed A2 Dominion, which has a base in Botley Road, Oxford, had agreed to build all social housing across the entire 5,000 home settlement.

Cherwell District Council confirmed it would pay £2.16m towards the primary school, £4m for the eco business centre and £3m for the energy centre using Government grants. A2 Dominion has also contributed £3.5m to the cost of the school.

Anti eco town campaigner Tony Walton, chairman of action group Bicester Against Eco Con (BaECON), said there were many questions still left unanswered.

The group is unhappy the council is contributing £9m to the infrastructure of the scheme and has labelled it a “white elephant”, saying its location and size are wrong.

Mr Walton said: “BaECON intend to examine the planning process, coordinate interested private and professional parties and continue to inform the public.”

A masterplan for the entire site is still being worked on by eco town facilitator P3Eco. It is looking at wildlife and archaeological surveys, and is due to be ready early next year.

Owen Robinson, a property consultant with Taylors Estate Agents, Market Square, Bicester, said: “I think the homes will definitely attract people. It’s a question of selling point and these houses will appeal to a lot of people, but it’s a difficult one to call. In principal it’s a good idea but I don’t know whether they’ll pull it off or not.

“The amount of people who come through the doors looking for an eco house is minimal.”

What the estate will include... A2 Dominion has planning permission to build the first 393 homes– 274 for private sale, 26 shared ownership and 93 rental properties. Homes will be designed for a lifetime meaning they can be adapted easily, and 64 per cent will be designed so a room can be built in the attic. The ethos of the site will be community, it will include play areas, communal barbecues areas, herb boxes, allotments, and seating. The design will encourage children to play in the street. Two entrances will be built both off the B4100 Banbury Road, and a new speed limit is likely to be introduced with a 20mph limit on the estate. Old hedgerows will be kept and moved within the site Ponds will be created to increase biodiversity. Traditional local materials will be used in construction and those manufactured will use green processes. Technology will be designed to cope with climate change of up to 10C. All appliances with be included and will be the highest environmental standard at the time. A tablet computer in every home will give real time information about buses, traffic and energy usage, and community messaging. A car club will be run by firm Common Wheels. Ten apprenticeships will be created. A gas powered combined heat and power plant will supply heat. Gas is bought in bulk and the cheaper rate passed on to households. All properties will have at least one parking space. Large properties will include a home office. Work will go towards environmental kitemark One Planet endorsement, currently only held by six developers in the country and 20 globally. There will be a bus-only stretch of road between phases one/two and three/four. For more information see nwbicester.co.uk

Comments(18)

Dilligaf2010 says...
11:08am Thu 17 May 12

“The amount of people who come through the doors looking for an eco house is minimal.” ......
......that might be because there aren't that many around, once people hear more about the cost savings, and many other advantages, there'll be plenty of people looking for one.

snert says...
11:22am Thu 17 May 12

“The amount of people who come through the doors looking for an eco house is minimal.”... Correct. People jsut want a house. If it happens to be eco, well it may be a bonus. It's like the energy efficiency certificates you're forced to get when you sell a house. Pointless. Noone seriously reconsiders buying a house for any things raised on there. People buy a house because they want it.

Let's review these points in the last section...

"Homes will be designed for a lifetime meaning they can be adapted easily, and 64 per cent will be designed so a room can be built in the attic".
London has become like this. Squashing as many rooms in as possible and the place looks awful Everyone living on top of each other.

"The ethos of the site will be community"
Good luck on that. Most people these days don't know their neighbours and many don't care. With the problem of living on top of each other people don't instantly becom chummy, they get annoyed.

"It will include play areas"
Read this as a place to vandalise.

"communal barbecues areas"
Are you serious???

"herb boxes"
I don't even know what to say about this.

"allotments, and seating"
Nice idea, not sure how many will be used. Allotments suffer from theft and vandalism on a large scale at the moment.

"The design will encourage children to play in the street"
you can't take your xbox/playstation into the street and parents are too afraid of their children being snatched these days so this won't happen.

"Two entrances will be built both off the B4100 Banbury Road, and a new speed limit is likely to be introduced with a 20mph limit on the estate"
20mph... good luck on that. It won't be policed. Villages have enough trouble trying to get a 30mph enforced. Might as well go back to pony and trap with this speed.

"Old hedgerows will be kept and moved within the site Ponds will be created to increase biodiversity"
Like this idea. In practice ponds need management. Jubilee Lake on Langford village (yes it has a name) springs to mind. It would be lovely if the waters were managed.

"Traditional local materials will be used in construction and those manufactured will use green processes."
What are traditional local materials? Brick? Wood? I seriously doubt the contractors will use small local businesses when they can get materials hugely cheaper from their standard suppliers.

"A tablet computer in every home will give real time information about buses, traffic and energy usage, and community messaging"
Who will support this? Most people will have one or more cars so busses will be largely a waste of time. The energy usage may be interesting. Community messaging??? Really?

"A car club will be run by firm Common Wheels"
I assume this is Commonwheels. This won't be a heavily used service as people will have their own cars.

"Ten apprenticeships will be created"
Good. Apprenticeships in what? Sponsored/paid for by whom? How long will these apprenticeships be in existence?

"A gas powered combined heat and power plant will supply heat. Gas is bought in bulk and the cheaper rate passed on to households"
Will people not be able to choose their own gas suppliers? Does this sound like a monopoly?

"All properties will have at least one parking space"
This seem to be new. Will all proposed 5000 houses have one space? What happened to the utopian idea we were all going to use busses or bikes?

"There will be a bus-only stretch of road between phases one/two and three/four"
M4 bus lane anyone?

I am poo-pooing this development because it is a complete con. In about 10 years I'd happily come back and sit with the developers and the councils responsible for allowing this to happen and say "I told you so".

Lady Penelopee says...
12:41pm Thu 17 May 12

Snert, you come across as such a misery guts! Life has to move forwards, so something has to change!

Pundit says...
1:12pm Thu 17 May 12

Is snert saying this to be mischievious, or is snert just plain ignorant? If the rest of the population was as stupid as this we would not have even basic inventions, like the wheel.

snert says...
1:16pm Thu 17 May 12

I'd like to see change for the better. I don't like govenrments and councils doing something as an experimental project which being carried out purely for a PR stunt (A Brown Town) and a big cash injection which is then given to conglomerates like P3co and A2 Dominion when the general public has voiced its opinion against such a development and been completely ignored. The government officials involved and many of those in the council decision making department along with P3co and A2 do not live here so the end result won't bother them. It bothers me.

Those in government and the companies involved are busy patting themselves on the back saying how great they are and employing a marketing team to tell us how great this utopian development will be when it is a huge con and it will never live up to any hollow promise thrust at us.

Tell me something... all of those things above in the article that I commented on; have you ever seen any community live like that? There are dozens of areas in the country where people live on top of each other and believe me, they're no fun place to live. You don't see high-rise developments any more because they're a bad environment. This is a slightly smaller scale version with a few green areas in it that will not be maintained properly.

I lived in Langford for over 2 years and there was barely any community there. There were a few that wanted one and I tried to get involved but the vast majority are simply not interested.

You don't design a community and expect everyone to live in bliss. Communities develop only when the majority look out for themselves and each other. Most villages are like that where people do stop and speak on the street and people do say hello to people they don't necessarily know. Villages have a community because the majority WANT to live there and are like minded villagers. They cannot be designed by a coporation or committee.

snert says...
2:04pm Thu 17 May 12

Pundit wrote:
Is snert saying this to be mischievious, or is snert just plain ignorant? If the rest of the population was as stupid as this we would not have even basic inventions, like the wheel.
Neither. I am not against development. The wheel was an invention that humanity benefitted from.

This eco town will not benefit the world or a community in any other way so why market it that way?

Say it as it is. It's a housing development to build houses for people to live in. That's it. The companies involved are not in it for the eco badge. They're in it for the money like everyone else is. It will be of little difference to any other housing estate.

As for ignorance... well, I've read all the nwbicester site, I've looked over everything that has been made publicly available and made my own decisions based on what I have seen and read and based on my experiences of how large companies work.

Ignorance is a lack of knowledge and understanding and on a subject. I've made my opinons based on what I've personally read, not because someone has told me "this is so".

Bicester Sister says...
2:40pm Thu 17 May 12

Bah humbug Snert - to quote 'I lived in Langford for over 2 years and there was barely any community there. There were a few that wanted one and I tried to get involved but the vast majority are simply not interested'

Community is what you make it. Ive found Bicester a lovely, friendly place to live.

Maybe no one wants to live next door to a miserable Victor Meldew type NIMBY!

to ny w says...
2:59pm Thu 17 May 12

1. If this is such a good idea, why isn't there are lead developer funding the project? P3ECO are just glorified land agents, they are not developers and don't take any development risks.
2. Lack of 1. means Cherwell are having to use £9m of public money to get this off the ground and hope to recover it from future developers.
3. If 1. continues then 2. becomes a huge financial gamble by 2. if no future developers come forward.
4. A2 Domiion are also getting £6m of grant funding to make their 394 units scheme work.
5. How can Cherwell give planning on a greenfield site when their is no local plan in place and no overall masterplan for the site?

Snert is right, it is an Eco Con.

LORD PETER MACVEY 0X2 6EG says...
3:29pm Thu 17 May 12

Lady Penelopee wrote:
Snert, you come across as such a misery guts! Life has to move forwards, so something has to change!
Pen Luv. These houses are built with paper thin walls. My neighbours complain about the home cinema in my house (a thick walled victorian) you can hear your neighbours f@rt in these new ones.

to ny w says...
3:36pm Thu 17 May 12

Dilligaf2010 wrote:
“The amount of people who come through the doors looking for an eco house is minimal.” ......
......that might be because there aren't that many around, once people hear more about the cost savings, and many other advantages, there'll be plenty of people looking for one.
1. Enthusiasm for CODE 5 housing hasn't been tested, but you can expect around £50,000 extra costs per house above current building regulations. Current regs are about 10% less efficient than code 1.
2. Market enthusiasm would be tested by whatever costs A2 Dominion pass on to the purchaser.
3. One thing is sure, the farmers who are selling the land wont be getting normal development values. So why should they sell?

White Elephant in the making.

Lady Penelopee says...
4:13pm Thu 17 May 12

LORD PETER MACVEY 0X2 6EG wrote:
Lady Penelopee wrote: Snert, you come across as such a misery guts! Life has to move forwards, so something has to change!
Pen Luv. These houses are built with paper thin walls. My neighbours complain about the home cinema in my house (a thick walled victorian) you can hear your neighbours f@rt in these new ones.
I was hoping they'd have better sound insulation than those shoddy timber frame things!

Would never buy anything that didn't have decent sound insulation!

snert says...
4:17pm Thu 17 May 12

Bicester Sister wrote:
Bah humbug Snert - to quote 'I lived in Langford for over 2 years and there was barely any community there. There were a few that wanted one and I tried to get involved but the vast majority are simply not interested'

Community is what you make it. Ive found Bicester a lovely, friendly place to live.

Maybe no one wants to live next door to a miserable Victor Meldew type NIMBY!
I think you missed the "I tried to get involved" bit. Try reading everything first. I went to community meetings. I was active on the Langford Life Forum. I went on the litter picking days. I went to the community days at the school. I did plenty. Those few that attended or did these things were very nice but it was a very small percentage of people. I've not said Bicester isn't friendly. It, and many otehr similar towns around the country are just as friendly. I live in a village outside of Bicester now and I find the community spirit is much greater there but that's villages for you.

Correct, people don't want to live next to a Victor Meldrew type and the Nimby reference is comical to say the least.

I'm not saying I don't want the eco town here; I don't want it at all, anywhere. It's a con. A Nimby is a "Not In My Back Yard(er)" person who simply doesn't want something to happen near where they live, not someone who complains about a huge con that is not going to acheive any of the results they expect.

I'm not just grumbling, I voice my complaints to those that should hear them through the proper channels and I will voice my opinion on places like this to try to make others wake up.

Rather than take a pop at me, why don't you try some counter arguments in favour of the eco town? I'd be interested to hear them. I'm happy to change my opinion if I could find something that would change my mind.

Severian says...
4:26pm Thu 17 May 12

The P3 in the name of the people behind this scheme says it all - it stands for Portfolio Property Partners. This scheme is nothing to do with bearded green Eco activists making a new life - this is property developers ripping up farmland to make lots of money, nothing more.
To get it through our councillors all the developers had to do was paint some pretty pictures and make promises about everyone getting a herb box and access to a half-hour bus service and they whizzed it through.
There has been no proper public consultation, no-one asked any of the awkward questions that Snert has raised, and no-one asked how the plans would impact on Bicester.
And THEN after the councillors agreed it the people behind the plan said they didn't have enough money to build the new town, so Cherwell District Council is having to spend £9,160,000 of OUR money to help make these people richer!
The whole thing stinks as far as I am concerned.

to ny w says...
4:38pm Thu 17 May 12

I agree with Severian, it stinks of a Blue Smoke screen.
This whole scheme is one mans folly. He told the people of Bucknell that when it was offered by CDC as a counter to Weston Otmoor, it would never happen. He said it was just a diversionary tactic.
He was economical with the truth, the government jumped at it, offered funding for the people of Bicester as a sweetner and now we are stuck with it.
That gentleman's 'misjudgement' is now somebody's financial gain.
What a pong!!!

Severian says...
5:07pm Thu 17 May 12

By the way - Bure Park was meant to be a 20mph estate, but the County Council refused to allow it. I wouldn't hold out much hopes of the Eco-town getting this.

AND - These houses will take 5 years to complete (finishing at the earliest by late 2017) and will only be built to eco-house Code 5 standards. Cherwell District Council's own planning strategy draft document says all new houses built after 2016 will HAVE to be to Code 6 standard - so CDC has given permission for a development which won't even meet their own standards.

One hand not knowing what the other hand is doing?

Professor Nohair says...
11:15am Fri 18 May 12

NIBY was coined for Nicholas Ridley who as a politician promoted one thing in parliament but when it applied to him personally he objected. It has nothing to do with perfectly sensible people not wanting an innapropriate cyinical developments, the wrong shape, wrong size, wrong place next to their communities. This particular one has been given a spurious 'Eco' soubriquet but like all developments of this sort is really about the money. There are plenty of other more appropriate sites but they are brownfield and therefore more difficult for potential developers to market. Covering good green field farming land, a good couple of miles from the nearest amenities in Bicester is not Eco it's Economic for the interested parties who will get rich but we will be left with a marooned island of houses homing isolated people who will get in their cars and drive to Bicester for all their needs.

to ny w says...
11:28am Fri 18 May 12

Cars?? With one parking space per house the estate will be so cluttered up with on street parking they wont be able to get out and drive to Bicester. Still the on street parking will at least stop kids playing in the street and getting run over!

Severian says...
2:19pm Fri 18 May 12

to ny w wrote:
Cars?? With one parking space per house the estate will be so cluttered up with on street parking they wont be able to get out and drive to Bicester. Still the on street parking will at least stop kids playing in the street and getting run over!
But the developer has introduced the idea of "play streets" on the Eco-town as a way to get out of providing sufficient decent and safe play areas for the kids. Imagine if you got rid of all the play parks on Bure Park and told the kids just to play on the road - that is effectively what our councillors have agreed for this new estate.

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree