Council has to fork out thousands of pounds felling and 'fixing' problem trees

Bicester Advertiser: Bicester Town Council leader James Porter, left, and operations manager Chris Johnson with the tree survey Buy this photo Bicester Town Council leader James Porter, left, and operations manager Chris Johnson with the tree survey

A COUNCIL will have to stump up tens of thousands of pounds to urgently fell or fix almost 1,000 trees across Bicester.

The blow came as Bicester Town Council completed a £20,000 tree survey after being warned by insurers that liability cover could be withdrawn.

In the past few years the council has been hit with claims totalling about £25,000 after its trees caused subsidence problems to properties, mainly in Langford Village.

Before the end of the current financial year the authority will have to spend £90,000 from its reserves to make 977 “high priority” trees safe.

Many of the problems have stemmed from developers planting inappropriate trees in wrong locations on new estates.

Then, as plants matured, they have caused problems to nearby homes.

Town councillor Les Sibley said the council had to “bite the bullet” and get the work done.

He said: “The problem is these trees look nice when they are planted but they are now causing a nightmare situation for the council and residents. It’s the roots that are a hidden menace.”

Work is planned between now and March next year and will include felling, crown lifting (removal of the lower branches of a tree’s crown to increase the distance between the base of the canopy and ground) and trimming branches. James Porter, the town council’s Conservative leader, said the cost of the work would be covered by reserves and would not impact on council tax.

Related links

He said: “It’s essential to do this. It’s a huge amount of money and we have been prudent and pragmatic and it will be dealt with within the budget.”

Comments (2)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

5:38pm Fri 19 Jul 13

snert says...

Well when an estate is being developed some sort of indemnity clause should be put in so that the developers hold liability if they plant trees inappropriately because they haven't bothered to fork out for a survey that tells them what the same tree is going to be doing in 20 years time.
Well when an estate is being developed some sort of indemnity clause should be put in so that the developers hold liability if they plant trees inappropriately because they haven't bothered to fork out for a survey that tells them what the same tree is going to be doing in 20 years time. snert
  • Score: 0

5:39pm Fri 19 Jul 13

snert says...

So, on that note the new eco disaster should have something in place for this as well as any further extensions to Kingsmere and the dozens of other housing developments that are slowly turning Bicester into a suburban metropolis.
So, on that note the new eco disaster should have something in place for this as well as any further extensions to Kingsmere and the dozens of other housing developments that are slowly turning Bicester into a suburban metropolis. snert
  • Score: 0

Comments are closed on this article.

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree